Is UNI safe to buy? Uniswap security analysis on BNB Chain
Automated honeypot, tax, liquidity and contract-permission analysis of UNI on BNB Chain. 0xbf5140a22578168fd562dccf235e5d43a02ce9b1
Last scanned:
SAFE
7 signals · 70% data completeness
Recursio scores UNI 87/100 — the SAFE band — from 7 signals at 70% data completeness. The score is held back mainly by Market activity (40/100), LP safety (15/100).
There is no buy or sell tax, and sell simulation succeeded for 1667 of 1667 real wallets (0.0% fail rate).
$1.6M of liquidity across 30 pairs is deep enough for retail-size trades.
No owner kill switches were found — no minting, pausing, blacklisting or adjustable tax.
Key risks for UNI
- Only 0% of LP is locked
UNI market & liquidity
| Price | $3.7900 |
|---|---|
| 24h change | 1.7% |
| Market cap | $2.4B |
| 24h volume | $3.3K |
| DEX liquidity | $1.6M |
| Holders | 107.8K |
| Trading pairs | 30 |
UNI contract security checks
| Honeypot | No |
|---|---|
| Verified source code | Yes |
| Mintable supply | Unknown |
| Transfers pausable | Unknown |
| Blacklist function | Unknown |
| Proxy contract | Yes |
| Owner can change balances | Unknown |
| Hidden owner | Unknown |
| Ownership can be reclaimed | Unknown |
| Self-destruct | Unknown |
| Tax modifiable by owner | Unknown |
| Trading cooldown | Unknown |
| Cannot sell all | No |
| Buy tax | 0% |
| Sell tax | 0% |
| Creator holdings | 0.0% |
| LP holders | 248 |
| LP locked | 0.0% |
| Listed on CEX | Yes |
Real-holder sell simulation for UNI
Recursio replays actual sell transactions for real UNI holders. This catches dynamic honeypots that pass a static contract audit — a token can look clean and still block most wallets from selling.
| Holders simulated | 1667 |
|---|---|
| Sold successfully | 1667 |
| Failed to sell | 0 |
| Fail rate | 0.0% |
| Simulated buy tax | 0.0% |
| Simulated sell tax | 0.0% |
| Highest tax seen | 0.0% |
| Risk level | low |
How the UNI safety score is calculated
The score is a weighted composite. Missing data lowers confidence rather than being silently skipped, and hard caps apply — a token with almost no liquidity or a failed sell simulation cannot score well no matter how clean its source code looks.
| Signal | Score | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Honeypot risk | 100/100 | 29% |
| Contract security | 100/100 | 17% |
| Owner risk | no data | 0% |
| Owner permissions | no data | 0% |
| Holder distribution | 100/100 | 11% |
| Liquidity | 100/100 | 17% |
| Market activity | 40/100 | 11% |
| ERC-20 compliance | no data | 0% |
| Clone / fake token | 100/100 | 7% |
| LP safety | 15/100 | 7% |
Run a live UNI check
This page is a cached snapshot. Contract owners can change taxes, pause transfers or pull liquidity minutes later — always re-scan immediately before you trade.
Frequently asked
Is UNI a honeypot?
Automated checks did not flag UNI as a honeypot at the time of this scan, with a 0.0% fail rate across simulated real-holder sells.
What are the UNI buy and sell taxes?
Buy tax 0%, sell tax 0% when scanned.
Can I trust this score?
It aggregates GoPlus contract security, honeypot.is real-holder sell simulation and DexScreener market data into one number. It measures contract and liquidity risk — not whether a price will go up. Nothing here is investment advice.
How to check a token yourself · What is a honeypot token
Recently checked tokens
- USDtb safety check (Ethereum) 94/100
- crvUSD safety check (Ethereum) 10/100
- OFC safety check (Base) 10/100
- UNKNOWN safety check (Base) 7/100
- Aurora safety check (Base) 10/100
- WAI safety check (BNB Chain) 10/100
- CAN safety check (BNB Chain) 80/100
- WCT safety check (Base) 75/100