Is LINGO safe to buy? Lingo security analysis on Base
Automated honeypot, tax, liquidity and contract-permission analysis of LINGO on Base. 0xfb42da273158b0f642f59f2ba7cc1d5457481677
Last scanned:
SAFE
9 signals · 90% data completeness
Recursio scores LINGO 78/100 — the SAFE band — from 9 signals at 90% data completeness. The score is held back mainly by Market activity (20/100), LP safety (15/100), Liquidity (70/100).
There is no buy or sell tax, and sell simulation succeeded for 792 of 792 real wallets (0.0% fail rate).
$104.2K of liquidity across 1 pairs is deep enough for retail-size trades.
The owner can still change the tax. That is not a prediction that they will — only that nothing stops them, and it happens without warning.
Key risks for LINGO
- Owner can change the tax
- Hidden owner
- Only 0% of LP is locked
- Almost no 24h trading volume
LINGO market & liquidity
| Price | $0.009638 |
|---|---|
| 24h change | 1.2% |
| Market cap | $1.1M |
| 24h volume | $785 |
| DEX liquidity | $104.2K |
| Holders | 31.0K |
| Trading pairs | 1 |
LINGO contract security checks
| Honeypot | No |
|---|---|
| Verified source code | Yes |
| Mintable supply | No |
| Transfers pausable | No |
| Blacklist function | No |
| Proxy contract | No |
| Owner can change balances | No |
| Hidden owner | Yes |
| Ownership can be reclaimed | No |
| Self-destruct | No |
| Tax modifiable by owner | Yes |
| Trading cooldown | No |
| Cannot sell all | No |
| Buy tax | 0% |
| Sell tax | 0% |
| Owner holdings | 0.0% |
| Creator holdings | 0.0% |
| LP holders | 5 |
| LP locked | 0.0% |
Real-holder sell simulation for LINGO
Recursio replays actual sell transactions for real LINGO holders. This catches dynamic honeypots that pass a static contract audit — a token can look clean and still block most wallets from selling.
| Holders simulated | 792 |
|---|---|
| Sold successfully | 792 |
| Failed to sell | 0 |
| Fail rate | 0.0% |
| Simulated buy tax | 0.0% |
| Simulated sell tax | 0.0% |
| Highest tax seen | 0.0% |
| Risk level | low |
How the LINGO safety score is calculated
The score is a weighted composite. Missing data lowers confidence rather than being silently skipped, and hard caps apply — a token with almost no liquidity or a failed sell simulation cannot score well no matter how clean its source code looks.
| Signal | Score | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| Honeypot risk | 100/100 | 22% |
| Contract security | 75/100 | 13% |
| Owner risk | 100/100 | 11% |
| Owner permissions | 75/100 | 11% |
| Holder distribution | 100/100 | 9% |
| Liquidity | 70/100 | 13% |
| Market activity | 20/100 | 9% |
| ERC-20 compliance | no data | 0% |
| Clone / fake token | 100/100 | 6% |
| LP safety | 15/100 | 6% |
Run a live LINGO check
This page is a cached snapshot. Contract owners can change taxes, pause transfers or pull liquidity minutes later — always re-scan immediately before you trade.
Frequently asked
Is LINGO a honeypot?
Automated checks did not flag LINGO as a honeypot at the time of this scan, with a 0.0% fail rate across simulated real-holder sells.
What are the LINGO buy and sell taxes?
Buy tax 0%, sell tax 0% when scanned. This contract lets the owner change the tax, so treat these numbers as a snapshot only.
Can I trust this score?
It aggregates GoPlus contract security, honeypot.is real-holder sell simulation and DexScreener market data into one number. It measures contract and liquidity risk — not whether a price will go up. Nothing here is investment advice.
How to check a token yourself · What is a honeypot token
Recently checked tokens
- USDtb safety check (Ethereum) 94/100
- crvUSD safety check (Ethereum) 10/100
- OFC safety check (Base) 10/100
- UNKNOWN safety check (Base) 7/100
- Aurora safety check (Base) 10/100
- WAI safety check (BNB Chain) 10/100
- CAN safety check (BNB Chain) 80/100
- WCT safety check (Base) 75/100